Legislation Details

File #: Ordinance 1916    Version: 1 Name: Alcohol Distance separation LDC Amendments
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 6/15/2012 In control: City Council
On agenda: 9/17/2012 Final action: 9/17/2012
Title: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21-5214 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
Attachments: 1. Ordinance, 2. Minutes, 3. Staff Report
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
9/17/20121 City Council approved on second & final readingPass Action details Meeting details Not available
8/6/20121 City Council introduced by council as seated and approved on first readingPass Action details Meeting details Not available
Title
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21-5214 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
Body
Summary and Background Information:  
 
This item went before City Council on May 14, 2012 at a study session.  In addition, this item was heard before Planning Commission  on July 3, 2012.  The items included herein are the same items that City Council directed staff to amend.  These items are as follows:
1) Editing the code for "like or similar establishments"
2) Remove the private club from this list having to obtain a conditional use permit.
3) Allow the code to only apply to businesses within the city.  
4) Revisit the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) requirement and change to a Use By Permit issued through the Board of Adjustment; and
5) Change the language from cabaret to entertainment license.
 
There are no changes planned to the 2500 foot distance separation requirement.  
 
 
Please see attached Planning Commission minutes for detailed background and discussion.
 
Staff Responsible (Department Head):  Chris Cramer, Interim Community Development Director
Staff Member Presenting:  Steve Timms, Interim Planning Manager
 
Staff Recommendation:  
Approval, per Planning Commission Recommendation.
 
Alternatives:
One option would be for City Council to approve the request as submitted by the applicant; a second option would be to approve the request subject to conditions; a third option would be for City Council to deny the request.